Rule7 Forums
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        


««123»»

The Pope - is he responsible for AIDS in... Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Wednesday, June 28, 2006 5:30 PM


Champion

ChampionChampionChampionChampionChampionChampionChampionChampion

Group: System Moderators
Last Login: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:37 PM
Posts: 311, Visits: 1,995
No,

Or at least not as important as say, the lack of societal organisation and support in Africa for a concerted and organised aids prevention programme.

The truckers who drive the long haul between the differing countries have done more for the spread of aids in the continent than any priest. 

Not to mention the lack of information about how the disease is spread or how it can be cured, one folk remedy is sex with a virgin...

Yes the pope is noob, we can all sit here, in nice comfy chairs and berate him for taking a really numb position on birth control.

But before we take the burning cross and shove it on the vatican lawn we should take a moment to consider, consider the facts about how we as an international community are not intervening nearly enough in Africa.  About how, even with all the criticism we can levy at the catholic church they raise funds and operate support structures in africa that do some good. 

And how just getting angry at an old bloke who wears a dress and believes he has a direct phone line to the almighty may not be the best way forward to solving this particular problem.

But he is a noob, definitely.  With the eyes of a killer that shine like gimlets on a dark night, and he's german too and they bombed our chippy. 

But does he get in the popemobile and fly over Rwanda beaming down evil thought rays getting the local government to commit genocide?  Does he campaign for Africa not to recieve debt relief? 

Blame DeBeer's(The joy of Diamonds ), blame the cold war, blame international exploitation of an under-developed economy.  Even blame the the twin evils of the Common market food policy and cash crops for wrecking the emergent African rural economy in the 70's. 

But dont regard the Roman Catholic churchs position on contraception as being a primary factor here.



But if you really *want* to bug Me and are still trying because I didnt put the damm contact field in properly....

Thegamefinisher@yahoo.co.uk

Post #4792
Posted Wednesday, June 28, 2006 7:29 PM


Wag

WagWagWagWagWagWagWagWag

Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Today @ 8:14 AM
Posts: 1,116, Visits: 1,732
Kessboy- sorry mate I came across the leaflet about three years ago while writing our county sexual health strategy, so I checked it out with colleagues who've worked out there, they confirmed it, along with the folklore stuff as preferable to commiting the sin of using a condom. I'll try to find the leaflet.

Just to clarify- you think the girl should have risked death to give birth to her rapists baby, and the Pope was right to excommunicate them all for putting their daughters life before that of the rapists foetus? Please tell me I misunderstood that bit!

Post #4800
Posted Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:28 AM
Heroic Knight

Heroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic Knight

Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:37 PM
Posts: 185, Visits: 626
Andy Rimmer (6/28/2006)
Kessboy- sorry mate I came across the leaflet about three years ago while writing our county sexual health strategy, so I checked it out with colleagues who've worked out there, they confirmed it, along with the folklore stuff as preferable to commiting the sin of using a condom. I'll try to find the leaflet.

Fair enough - just wanted to check that you knew what you were talking about!  That's utterly horrendous, do you know if it was Vatican approved, if so that's a serious moral crime.

Andy Rimmer (6/28/2006)
Just to clarify- you think the girl should have risked death to give birth to her rapists baby, and the Pope was right to excommunicate them all for putting their daughters life before that of the rapists foetus? Please tell me I misunderstood that bit!

You're half right.  I feel that the girl should have had an abortion if she was unwilling to risk her own death (I'd choose an abortion over my death any day!)  However, I also hold that if you profess to believe that abortion is a sin against God (which I don't), which is irreconcilable with your religious organisation, and the person involved does not repent, then you have no choice but to excommunicate.

IE I believe his opinion on abortion is wrong, but if the church holds that view, then they shouldn't allow people who commit that sin in their church (if they don't repent).  Just as they shouldn't allow unrepentant rapists, murderers, criminals etc (I'm not for one moment comparing abortion and murder - but I know that the Catholic Church does.)

Post #4859
Posted Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:04 PM
Knight

KnightKnightKnightKnightKnightKnightKnightKnight

Group: Basic Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 8:24 PM
Posts: 64, Visits: 208
Just to further muddy the water with more "facts" you may want to read http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2824241.stm for a slightly different take (there are others as well). I'm assuming it's the same case despite a few little discrepancies? I believe the excommunication was declared ipso facto by the head of the Nicaraguan church.
Post #4864
Posted Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:18 PM
Heroic Knight

Heroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic Knight

Group: Basic Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 9:52 PM
Posts: 190, Visits: 1,514
DavidM, sorry mate, but that link didn't seem to work for me... I have found this related link which is of interest though

http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=20020

____________________________________________________________

Idiots can be so much fun, thats why every village wants one....
Post #4869
Posted Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:26 PM
Heroic Knight

Heroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic Knight

Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Sunday, November 09, 2008 6:56 PM
Posts: 245, Visits: 1,267
This whole "can't get aids from a virgin" thing. Isn't that entirely logical? I mean, until AIDS entered the blood transfusion supply (thank you Cheap American Prison Plasma) the only likely way to get HIV was by having sex. I mean... its an STD, isn't it? So someone who has not had sex cannot have caught HIV, right?

That may be an uninformed conclusion, but its certainly a logical one.

Now, the Catholic Church has things to say about using condoms... but it has worse things to say about rape, child molestation and even sex outside marriage. What part of the Christian portfolio of monogamy and no-nookie-before-bookie would lead anyone to assume that the result of telling people that virgins don't have AIDS would be for men to go out and rape teenagers? And, frankly, how would the raping of those teenagers have been better if the man had worn a condom?

It easy to blame a reluctance to use condoms on the Pope, but how do we blame him for the Tribal violence, genocidal rape squads and UN peace-keeping operations*? How do we blame a profoundly anti-nookie religion for rape and people having rampant sex outside of marriage?

I'm not denying that the condom thing is counter-productive, but I have to put it in perspective. 

* Stationing African troops as part of UN peace-keeping forces in other parts of Africa has contributed greately to the spread of HIV. It may well be that as many as 75% of the Zimbabwe armed forces are HIV positive.


Dave 2 / Man in Blue

LT - Artfiel Macenion Duvall, Knight of Celestial
EOS - Weeping Boar, War Sayer of the Mystwalker Tribe
Maelstrom - Tal Rufen, Quicksilver Trading
Riftworld - Cpl Caplin San Angelo, 48th Assault Recon
Post #4870
Posted Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:34 PM
Heroic Knight

Heroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic Knight

Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Thursday, August 30, 2007 3:06 PM
Posts: 100, Visits: 352
Man in Blue (6/29/2006)
This whole "can't get aids from a virgin" thing. Isn't that entirely logical? I mean, until AIDS entered the blood transfusion supply (thank you Cheap American Prison Plasma) the only likely way to get HIV was by having sex. I mean... its an STD, isn't it? So someone who has not had sex cannot have caught HIV, right?


No. Any blood-to-blood (or other bodily-fluid to bodily-fluid) contact can transmit the virus. So, medical staff can contract HIV from patients via needlestick injuries, midwives can contract the virus if they happen to have a small cut on their hand or arm while they're delivering the baby of an HIV positive mother, loads of ways it can happen. Sex is just the most common route of transmission
Post #4872
Posted Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:49 PM
Heroic Knight

Heroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic KnightHeroic Knight

Group: Basic Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 9:52 PM
Posts: 190, Visits: 1,514
Whilst it is perhaps logical to assume that sex with a virgin is unlikely to lead to you catching HIV, I think Coops was referring to the commonly held belief in some parts of Africa that having sex with a virgin could cure HIV.

A rather daft notion that has probably contributed to the high rates of teenage rape victims.

I have to agree that in order to stop the continueing spread of HIV and AIDs intervention is desperatly needed, and without wishing to sound like Blair, that intervention must come in the form of education, education, education....

____________________________________________________________

Idiots can be so much fun, thats why every village wants one....
Post #4874
Posted Thursday, June 29, 2006 2:08 PM