|
|
|
Initiate
      
Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Today @ 10:10 PM
Posts: 1,
Visits: 79
|
|
Matt, you may be right about needing more than one person to keep your wordcount down. I think I need one as well... Hey.... that gives me a great idea... I heard people round here talking about a writing club. We could have our own club.... We would have a no-writing club! Every week we'd have a quick meeting to see how much shit members had written on Rule7 that week... We could all commit to getting our verbiage down below a certain word-count. We could critique each other's posts (see here you wrote an entire paragraph to rebut this guy, when you could have just said "you're talking shit") and help each other try and really decrease the amount of stuff we write each week. And anyone who posted too much would be out!
Never mind a LRP organisation, hows THAT for an idea... [/quote]"you're talking shit"
|
|
|
|
|
Heroic Knight
      
Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:03 AM
Posts: 104,
Visits: 491
|
|
| Our approach to forming a larp society was to: 1) Have some larp advocates write a constitution of what society's purpose was. This went through some iterations with feedback from the community. 2) Get together enough people to sign the constitution and allow us to encorporate a legal non-profit entity by lodging it with the government. Being a legal entity is useful if you want to apply for grants from anyone, and it also lets you form a bank account here. 3) Sign up everyone who wanted to join the society for a small fee, and then have these members nominate and vote in the committee (the roles of which were outlined in the constitution). The result is that people with enthusiasm compete for committee positions and the society as a whole votes in a new committee yearly at an AGM. In my opinion voting has been based on the nominees reputations for getting things done and their ability to communicate how they'll be useful to the society. It's a pretty good system for creating a committee that the majority of society members are happy with. But the society as a whole is only as useful as its goals. Which are specific to your local needs. In our case, we thought that a lot more larps would start if people didn't have to worry about the up-front money. So we created a system where the larp organisers create a budget, and if we approve it (based on whether we think the larp will make its money back) we lend them the startup money they need for booking venues, etc. Also, the society owns a lot of larp gear and lends it out to larps, and is accumulating services to provide to larpers. We've just spent a grand on a colour duplex laser printer that will be made available for larps to print high-quality material much more cheaply than from a print shop. Where we get the money from is another kettle of fish, and perhaps less suited to independant-minded UK larpers. Basically the society "owns" the non-profit larps (and larp-related projects like New Zealand's larp forum Diatribe) that it lends money to, and the society retains the profits from those larp events. These profits are used to lend money and buy equipment. The organisers have complete creative control, they just don't own the gear or any profit and they need approval on budgets. Which isn't an issue for non-profit larps that believe the society has something to offer them. We also lend equipment to non-society larps and provide services to them, but we only lend money to larp projects run within the society. It's a way of minimising risk and ensuring we have capital to spend on promoting larp. A lot of larps have started up using the society. Our main problem now is finding enough new larper blood to play all these events.
|
|
|
|
|
Champion
      
Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Sunday, September 21, 2008 11:31 AM
Posts: 284,
Visits: 2,474
|
|
One thing me & Ian were talking about randomly yesterday, was what if the Government decided to ban anything that might resemble a weapon?
Apparently actors are exempt from this kind of ban as they may need stage weapons to fight with, etc (2nd hand info btw...) so one reason for a UK-wide LARP Soc, or LARP Guild, or whatever, might be so that members could claim actor status, or something, so we wouldn't lose our hobby with any ban on replica weaponry...
Maybe the best way to organise it would be have Someone In Charge - who can then be voted in the next year by the members, a group of people (*hides*Board/Committee) elected from the membership - no more than one from any ref team and no more than two from any system, perhaps? And then see where it went...
R7: Xarra // RL: Clare Selley // PD: Serengeti Blackpaw
|
|
|
|
|
Wag
      
Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Today @ 6:28 PM
Posts: 1,387,
Visits: 1,920
|
|
Xarra (7/8/2007) a group of people (*hides*Board/Committee) elected from the membership - no more than one from any ref team and no more than two from any system, perhaps? And then see where it went...
Personally I think any kind of priority for "big" systems or any kind of limits for any system is unhelpful. Given that more people play the LT than any other system, it seems odd to say "you can't be on the committee, there is is already an LT'er on the committee". Equally I'd hate to think they went looking for someone who was a "PD'er" to fill their quota...
If you have a committee why not just have people on it who are good enough to be on it?
History is an important source for LRP. Along with other works of fiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Apprentice
      
Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 5:00 PM
Posts: 10,
Visits: 23
|
|
| This has been interesting reading, as a very new larper I'm sure I can only add a little to the discussion. However I did spend a few years BMX'ing in my youth, I was rubbish my brother was British Champ one year and raced in several world championships. My Mum and Dad were both involved at our local club to start with and eventually my Dad was chairman for the South West Region and represented Devon and COrnwall at the National Meetings. This was for EBA, English BMX Association. As it's a sport, committee's are often needed to arrange the competions etc. There was the usual amount of poloticing going on etc. The EBA was in turn a member of the National Cycling Federation (can't remember the actual name). It all worked quite well, as a member you got your individual insurance, clubs that were members got insurance for their race tracks and it was easier to get St. Johns ambulance and you took part in the structured regional and national events gaining rankings etc. Plus they lobbied for National Lottery grant money to host the Worlds one year. This was all run by volunteer adults, most of whom did not race but had kids that did or used to. The only issue was that there was also the BBMXA which was the British BMX Association which did exactly the same thing for the same sport but held completly seperate events. I don't think they were in the World Wide organisation but it just goes to show that if you set up one UK representative Committee for LRP there is nothing to stop anyone else setting one up for LARP. Although I do believe that the 2 BMX groups have now teamed up and are one big happy family  It could be very useful to have an organisation that affiliation to means you meet certain codes of conduct on sites etc, have insurance, have first aiders on site, abide by laws such as smoking and licensing laws. (Also this body could get and give out clear guidlines on such issues as well as keep an eye on issue such as replica weapons). But if currently organisers aren't having any issues with this then is it needed? With the internet now it's much easier for people to access good information about any hobby so do you really need an organisation to be a first point of contact? Any organisation like this should only enhance and help with what people are doing and not make life harder or exclude anyone and that can be hard to achieve, looking at good working examples would be a great place to start. Hope this is helpful and not just waffle
"What..who...where?"
|
|
|
|
|
Champion
      
Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Today @ 1:26 PM
Posts: 492,
Visits: 2,040
|
|
| Again, I'm still failing to see what the purpose of the committee would actually be If the government out-lawed anything resembling a weapon then fine. We're setting up a committee to campaign to have that over-ruled. But they haven't We don't have competitions (for the most part). I dont see what promotion we'd need to do, and I can't see that we'd be able to get better deals by being members of the group RyanPaddy's situation is fine, as they have a purpose (to support up and coming events by financial and kit loans) but I think the UK LRP scene is sufficiently well developed that this isn't as necessary here So I still don't what would the activites of the committee would be (as opposed to the aims). We're all in agreement that promoting and supporting LRP as a hobby is good, but how exactly would this committee acheive that?
- -------------
-
- Brighton Below : Organiser
- Serenity: Capt Tom Crowson
- RL: Simon / Trez
|
|
|
|
|
Heroic Knight
      
Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Sunday, October 05, 2008 3:55 PM
Posts: 224,
Visits: 1,165
|
|
Trez (7/11/2007) Again, I'm still failing to see what the purpose of the committee would actually be
If the government out-lawed anything resembling a weapon then fine. We're setting up a committee to campaign to have that over-ruled. But they haven't
If they were, a newly formed committee would not necessarily have the "oomph" to persuade them otherwise... whereas if we were able to form a strong presence prior to any such situation we may well be in a better position.
As for specific activites for the committee to undertake - here's a couple of things I think could be useful, based on stuff I've done before...
1) Contact national publications and agencies and negotiate advertising for National LRP Events
2) Attempt to gain recognition as a sport or hobby group (this does have a number of benefits, including greater access to funding, a certain degree of legal protection and the ability to claim national recognition)
3) Attempt to secure support/ financial deals with companies (and this is a possibility with regards insurance, if the above mentioned recognition as a sport or hobby group is given)
4) Provide media relations and advice to LRP groups if needed (it can be very daunting if the media catch onto you and you don't know how to deal with them)
5) Research areas like insurance, promotions, equipment etc. and maintain a database of them for use by LRP groups (kind of like a "we recommend" list, based on price, reliability etc, and allowing groups to avoid spending months researching things themselves)
I'm sure other stuff would come up as well. I know that this might all seem a bit, well, committee-speak-ish, but it is actually useful.
Maelstrom - Elspeth Grigori - Holy Martyr
Lilith Sartia - I see weird people!
EOS - Maram-amma Suran - The Very Important Wife
Reality - Rebecca Willatts
|
|
|
|
|
Champion
      
Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Today @ 1:26 PM
Posts: 492,
Visits: 2,040
|
|
| That makes more sense, and actually puts a clearer perspective on the purpose of the group. I do support having a group but think we'd need to have very clear and specific intentions on what we're trying to achieve.
- -------------
-
- Brighton Below : Organiser
- Serenity: Capt Tom Crowson
- RL: Simon / Trez
|
|
|
| | |