|
|
|
Champion
      
Group: Game Moderators
Last Login: Today @ 9:46 AM
Posts: 450,
Visits: 2,078
|
|
| Ok, People on Pagga are crying because someone wrote some guidelines and they are trying to take them as canon. So I thought i'd road test the robustness of decate on the new board. First, check the ammo works.. fuck, piss, twat bollocks.... All present and correct and probably a few people impressed despite what the guide/rules say! Right sop my road test topic here is where can you get the best PvP. Now my answer is not a devils advocatey piece of crap, this is really my opinion, so call me out if you think I am wrong. I think the LT is still the best place for PvP potentioal. Now there are 2 reasons I still think LT has over Malestrom and one of the reasons also gives it the edge over Cp. The first is Scale. quite simply i'm a scale junkie. I like to have lots of different possible enemies or allies and still have a big enough playerbase that those disparate enemies/allies can still number 2-300 each (or twice that if your the dragons). Quite simply maelstrom and Cp cannot offer that. At maelstrom I think the number of colonies/churhes/houses/native means that these groupings get mostly watered down. sure there are some that can muster 50+, but there are too many colonies of a handful! The second reason I think LT has the most potential for PvP is that it's looser background leaves people frrer to move there faction in different directions. It's almost like we are playing with a mostly clean board and we can move it as we want to as opposed to what someone wrote happened 50 years ago in a non roleplayed encounter. So there you have it, whilst I love maelstrom for it's immersion and quality of roleplay and system (1 sec rule excepted) I think LT still has more PvP potentital Stu
RL: Stuart Maher PD: Stuart Maher in a frock coat LT: Stuart maher in orange hi-vis Omega: Stuart Maher in a rat mask BUTT: Stuart Maher in various crap costumes EOS: Stuart Maher writing plot EOS - Book now, thank me later. I was going to copyright my posts... but then remembered this is an LRP forum!
|
|
|
|
|
Knight
      
Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:57 PM
Posts: 92,
Visits: 256
|
|
I agree that the LT has the potential to be great for PvP but it is hamstrung in practice by one simple fact - the people responsible IC for the factions are also responsible for them OOC. If a Faction NPC goes out and instigates PvP conflict then sooner or later they are going to get stabbed up for it - at that point the faction suffers OOC because they need to find a replacement, the NPC team has to adapt and the whole process causes disruption which affects the game for hundreds of players. So instead of gloves-off PvP we have this watered down version where we go and attack faction gates every now and again, gob off at each other and rarely do anything significant about our differences. Factions pushing the PvP game are punished whilst those who keep their heads down stay strong.
Ian
ps. I doubt the Dragons are above 400 mark at the moment.
________________________________________________
LT Dragons Faction Forum - muster.dragonsfaction.org
|
|
|
|
|
Heroic Knight
      
Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 12:32 PM
Posts: 147,
Visits: 836
|
|
| Admittedly, its been a while since I've been to the LT, but when I did I never really thought it was all that great for PvP, for a number of reasons: Firstly, the loose background system which you present as an advantage (i.e. a largely undefined game world) robs players of background motivation for interaction. You could argue thats a good thing as it means motivations for PVP are based on time-in stuff only, but in practice it seems to mean the main motivation is that the NPCs and plot team have decided faction X does something bad to faction Y. Enough players could affect this, but only slowly. Secondly, the LT is sometimes a bit "time-ish" and IC PVP gets construed as an OOC grudge. I do remember when I was there, one group decided to go all out to kill another group because they were plainly dodgy, and got told to stop by the refs because it was upsetting the group OOC. Thirdly, greater power concentration than most systems means that most players dont have anything worth taking, and those that do are very powerful and difficult to take on by most players. Fourthly, the ability of players to affect the overall status quo is quite limited. Imagine you wanted to wipe out a faction or guild, completely, as a player. I dont think it could be done. I appreciate that due to its size and need to appeal to as wide a playerbase as possible, the LT has to have a strongly controlled IC environment, but this does have a bit of a "kid gloves" effect on PVP. Mark.
Awww, its no fun when you admit it!
-But it is when I make the salad dressing!
(Weebl & Bob)
|
|
|
|
|
Initiate
      
Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 6:43 PM
Posts: 6,
Visits: 19
|
|
| I agree with the 'kid-gloves' comment to a degree, but I also agree with Stu on the scale comment. This is a biased opinion, as I have never done (not yet anyway) another LRP system; LT is my first to date. However, from where I sit the LT has huge potential in regards PvP, it's just a matter of getting it done. Not many players I have talked to prefer PvM over PvP, so it's simply a case of wanting it hard enough for it to happen.
-------------------------------- "People say violence in the last resort. That's why I use violence as my first, and cut out all the other options that would have failed." E.D.Gav
|
|
|
|
|
Wag
      
Group: System Moderators
Last Login: Thursday, August 21, 2008 11:39 PM
Posts: 1,141,
Visits: 3,626
|
|
| Any LRP event is what you make it. That's you as the players and you and the organisers. From what I have seen, background/rules/system/downtime don't seem to make much difference if all your players are prats who just want to sit around and get drunk. They can encourage and stimulate such things but they can never force people to toe your party line. On that comment, I would say that LT does have the potential for good PvP but it is not due to its scale. An individual's experience of any given Gathering event can vary wildly from 'Really good, best event ever' to 'absolutely boring, I found taking a c*ap more interesting'. If you can be bothered to go out and find something to do or know people who are involved in plot that is going or make something up for you to interest yourself then you can have a great event. If you turn up with a 'story led' attitude of 'I'll sit here and wait to see what plot happens' then chances are you will lose out. The same essentially applies to Maelstrom and I suspect that it largely depends on who you hang out with or how self motivated you are. But I think it largely depends on what you want out of an event. Personally, for really intensive interaction, PvP plot and complex interaction I would go to neither Maelstrom or LT or CP but to a smaller event - an NWO, Blood red roses, Gall saga, Vikings, Artificer. But that is just a personal opinion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Whispering God is your friend... trust the Whispering God... Ruins of Empire 1st - 3rd Feb, 2008, Gladstone scout centre, Chester
|
|
|
|
|
Champion
      
Group: Game Moderators
Last Login: Today @ 9:46 AM
Posts: 450,
Visits: 2,078
|
|
Cheeslord (5/17/2006) Firstly, the loose background system which you present as an advantage (i.e. a largely undefined game world) robs players of background motivation for interaction. You could argue thats a good thing as it means motivations for PVP are based on time-in stuff only, but in practice it seems to mean the main motivation is that the NPCs and plot team have decided faction X does something bad to faction Y. Enough players could affect this, but only slowly.Most (should be all) faction and main plot teams should be prepared to throw out most of there lovingly prepared plot if players get off there backsides and make the world turn. This has happened in the past. I watched 200+ encounter sheets get binned during the dark/light alliance wars in 2003 (or was it 2002) which were 100% player led. Still best gathering we've had! scripted plots are a neccesary safety net if the players do nothing (their choice, they are players, they do what they want). If the players act and turn the wolrd ther is no need to script the world turning Cheeslord (5/17/2006) Secondly, the LT is sometimes a bit "time-ish" and IC PVP gets construed as an OOC grudge. I do remember when I was there, one group decided to go all out to kill another group because they were plainly dodgy, and got told to stop by the refs because it was upsetting the group OOC.I'd love to know details on this as certainly during my time at the LT it was not what I came across, however I do not in any way deny it happened. The key word was potential. To achieve that both the players and the staff need to be prepared to ake it on. Cheeslord (5/17/2006) Thirdly, greater power concentration than most systems means that most players dont have anything worth taking, and those that do are very powerful and difficult to take on by most players.Difficult.. or a challenge. but that is an yeasy thing to say when I am not ingame facing one of these groups, so feel free to disregard it. The power levels of the LT have long been an issue that the LT have tried to counter. The removal of immune to normal being a great example of a field leveller. This year the cataclysm should (should, this is an inititiave started after I wnet back to playing so i know nothing about it other than any other player) also go a long way to redressing that balance as it is putting future power levels as an in game character choice. Cheeslord (5/17/2006) Fourthly, the ability of players to affect the overall status quo is quite limited. Imagine you wanted to wipe out a faction or guild, completely, as a player. I dont think it could be done..It could be done.. but it should be just as easy as me trying to single handedly bring down france or mc donalds. remember a faction is more than just the 200 players who turn up so at an event you're more liklley to heavily dent a faction than to eridicate it. This has happened in the past and was all player led. The Light alliance was a player led occourance as was the retribution on the jakals and bears. Cheeslord (5/17/2006) I appreciate that due to its size and need to appeal to as wide a playerbase as possible, the LT has to have a strongly controlled IC environment, but this does have a bit of a "kid gloves" effect on PVP.I can see where you see that from, with the advantage of scale comes a lot of disadvantages, but I think the advantages outweigh them. A lot of this can be handled by players having a biyt of flexability and sometimes being prepared to accept something that is not an ideal IC occourance for the gretaer good of the game. However this should not be an excuse for flange, which it does become. Stu
RL: Stuart Maher PD: Stuart Maher in a frock coat LT: Stuart maher in orange hi-vis Omega: Stuart Maher in a rat mask BUTT: Stuart Maher in various crap costumes EOS: Stuart Maher writing plot EOS - Book now, thank me later. I was going to copyright my posts... but then remembered this is an LRP forum!
|
|
|
|
|
Initiate
      
Group: Basic Members
Last Login: Thursday, June 29, 2006 9:29 PM
Posts: 4,
Visits: 6
|
|
| From my point of view LT has the most PvP purely because you don't die. People are far more likely to have a go at someone else when the ritual of peace is up. Where as is CP/Omega/Malestrom etc. etc. the consquences of your actions are greater so there is more deliberation before going full on PvP. Saying this, PvP in these other systems is far more interesting and exciting for that reason.
|
|
|
|
|
Champion
      
Group: Game Moderators
Last Login: Today @ 9:46 AM
Posts: 450,
Visits: 2,078
|
|
honesty (5/17/2006) From my point of view LT has the most PvP purely because you don't die. I know a lot of people who know for a fact that is utter crap!
RL: Stuart Maher PD: Stuart Maher in a frock coat LT: Stuart maher in orange hi-vis Omega: Stuart Maher in a rat mask BUTT: Stuart Maher in various crap costumes EOS: Stuart Maher writing plot EOS - Book now, thank me later. I was going to copyright my posts... but then remembered this is an LRP forum!
|
|
|
| | |